Tuesday, 7 June 2016

Saving time: self-audits on-line

Quantifying the amount of time organisations spend on the self-audit task is difficult.  It will vary from one supplier to the next and from buyer to buyer. What is known is that it is a repetitive task, and needlessly so.  

In my experience as an aviation buyer of 20+ years, vendor management often "falls between the cracks" with neither the quality department nor the purchasing department wanting ownership.  Hardly surprising given how difficult and time consuming it can be to set up initially, and then to control.  

I sent out 500+ self-audits to suppliers, with frequent reminders, keeping accurate records as to if/when they responded, and if they didn't reply I was presented with a non-conformance by the quality department. This was hugely time consuming and took me away from my main task of purchasing spares to support the airline fleet.  Having visited many airlines to discuss AvSMART.aero, I know that my 500 suppliers is dwarfed by those of some purchasing departments, making it an even more onerous task. From a supplier's viewpoint, it's understandable how there would be a delay in returning these forms, if they are receiving the same (or similar) form from potentially hundreds of buyers.  A quality department has many tasks  and rarely dedicate an individual solely to completing these forms.  Often they produce a standard pack, but even this can take time to keep updated, and costs money to reproduce and re-send.

This particular buyer decided to do something about the problem and here's one thing that is easily quantifiable: AvSMART.aero is just one form, easy to update, and changes are automatically communicated to buyers using MyAvSMART.  The initial completion may take 20 minutes, with updates taking very little time at all, simply log in and change information as required. 

Please take a look - if it doesn't fulfil your needs let us know why - we can add questions so it becomes the only self-audit tool you need.  One slightly longer form is far preferable to many, many forms repeating the same request for information.  

Be smart with AvSMART.

3 comments:

  1. Yes, it is a really clever app. My business is very similar to yours. But there is one difference, I use restaurant inspection forms https://form.com/restaurant-inspection/. Easily conduct thorough restaurant inspections on any smart device—with or without an Internet connection. Form.com integrates our mobile inspection app, cloud-based platform, and BI dashboards with your existing IT infrastructure to help you understand exactly what’s happening, right now, everywhere.

    ReplyDelete

  2. I'm really enjoying the theme/design of your website. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A couple of my blog audience have complained about my site not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera. Do you have any advice to help fix this problem? craigslist charlotte

    ReplyDelete
  3. 3D printing price per part relies on giant number} of factors, including design, material, process, and publish print operations. Typically, the publish print operations account for a lot of the part price, particularly if manual labor is involved. In common, the laser powder mattress sintering processes like SLS and MJF are the most optimal economic selections for finish use elements if price is a key factor. Check out this blog publish to better understand what drives {the price of|the worth of} 3D printing. Stereolithography and fused deposition modeling are two common plastic 3D printing process usually used for rapid prototyping. While Commercial Can Openers both emerged in the Nineteen Eighties, they use distinctly different ways to make elements, and in consequence, have distinct advantages relying on your part requirements.

    ReplyDelete